Categories
Announcements

An updated resource for the NIH Center for Scientific Review offers practical insights into the application process.

The CSR’s Insider’s Guide to Peer Review includes advice from current and former study section chairs. With competition for NIH grants intensifying, most applicants may want to heed some of the tips to put their best foot forward. New advice included in the guide:

Don’t overstate the significance of your research: It’s great if you can say your results could one day have an impact on treating or preventing disease. But don’t promise more than you can deliver. You really need to make more than a general case for significance. Explain the specific significance of the particular question you’re asking and how your results may fill important technical or knowledge gaps or otherwise impact your field

Make your aims sing and harmonize: Quickly lay out the broad context, the scientific question to be addressed, including its significance, and exactly how you propose to advance understanding of your problem. Craft your aims carefully so reviewers will see both their individual and synergistic worth

Focus your preliminary data: Insert a very succinct paragraph to explain what the preliminary data really tell you and how they show the feasibility of your proposed research. Make your application compelling by citing preliminary or prior work that shows the feasibility of each of your aims. Also, don’t assume your reviewers will remember all your preliminary data from the significance section. If you have a lot, you may want to briefly refer to a key bit in your research strategy section.

Read the guide.

Categories
Announcements

The Office of the Vice President for Research and GrantSMART have developed a list of resources to assist researchers in developing the broader impacts sections of their grant proposals.

The National Science Foundation uses two merit review criterion for evaluating research proposals for funding: Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts.

  • The Intellectual Merit criterion encompasses the potential to advance knowledge.
  • The Broader Impacts criterion encompasses the potential to benefit society and contribute to the achievement of specific, desired societal outcomes.

Both criteria are to be given full consideration during the review and decision-making processes; each criterion is necessary but neither, by itself, is sufficient. Therefore, proposers must fully address both criteria.

UGA resources listed on the Resources for Broader Impacts Sections include educational and outreach projects and organizations, ranging from Archway Partnership communities to College of Education Outreach & Engagement to Georgia Intern-Fellowships for Teachers.

If you have a resource to add to this list, please contact rcomm@uga.edu.

 

Categories
Announcements

New to the NIH grants process? Looking for some direction? A new YouTube video, The NIH Grants Process: the Big Picture, produced by the NIH Office of Extramural Research (OER), provides a high-level overview of the grants process from application to award.

As you begin to navigate the NIH grants process, be sure to bookmark grants.nih.gov for many more online resources. These include guidance on the various aspects of the grants process, podcasts, webinars, policy information, the NIH Guide to Grants and Contracts, and so much more. More videos related to NIH grants information may be also be found on on YouTube.

Categories
Announcements

The NSF Grant Proposal Guide has been updated and the changes go into effect 02/24/14.  The updated guide, as well as a summary of the changes, can be found at the link below.

The revised guide contains changes to policies that impact proposal preparation as well as updates and clarifications intended to make the proposal process more user-friendly.

2014 Grant Proposal Guide

Click here for a summary of significant changes in the new version.

Categories
Announcements

For researchers who submit to NIH, please note the following changes to eSubmission requirements.  Please contact your Grants administrator if you have questions.

Don’t Forget Your Inclusion Data

The new FORMS-C application packages use a different approach for collecting inclusion data. In addition to reformatting the data tables themselves, inclusion data is no longer collected in PDF attachments. Instead, each package includes new Planned Enrollment Report and Cumulative Inclusion Enrollment forms. These forms allow NIH to collect the data in a format that can be leveraged throughout the lifecycle of the application/grant.

The forms are included in the application packages as ‘Optional’ and eRA systems no longer provide an error when inclusion data is omitted.  However, our policies on when to include the data in your application have not changed. Applicants must carefully follow application guide and supplemental instructions to ensure the new forms are included when needed. A handy decision tree was recently posted that can also help determine whether the inclusion reporting policies apply to your specific application.

FORMS-C Budget Forms and PD/PIs

The latest version of the R&R Budget form developed by Grants.gov includes some changes in how data is entered. Although the PD/PI name provided on the SF424 R&R cover form is still used to auto-populate the first Senior/Key Person entry in Section A, the Project Role filed for that entry no longer defaults to ‘PD/PI’ and must be manually entered. As a result, more applicants have been running into the following error:

There must be a Personnel entry (with a role of “PD/PI”) listed for the PI or PD on the 424 RR Detailed Budget Page (section A&B) for budget year <x>. (5.7.1)

It is critical to type the string ‘PD/PI’ – NOT ‘PI’ or ‘PI/PD’ or ‘Principal Investigator’ or ‘Co-PD/PI’ – you must use ‘PD/PI’ or you will get that dreaded error. So, please add this to your pre-submission application checks to avoid a corrective submission.

K, F, T and D Programs Moving to Updated Electronic Application Forms (FORMS-C)
A reminder notice regarding the transition of Career Development (Ks), Fellowship (Fs), Training (Ts/Ds) programs to updated electronic application forms (NOT-OD-14-027).

  •  All F, K, T and D submissions for due dates on or after January 25, 2014 must use the new application forms. Applications submitted using incorrect application forms will not be accepted.
  • Research Training (T), Career Development (K) and Fellowship (F) Parent Announcements will be reissued under new Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) numbers. All other active F, K, T and D FOAs will be updated to include a FORMS-C package with the existing announcement (i.e., no FOA number change). NIH is making every effort to have the new FOAs and packages in place 45-60 days prior to the first due date that falls on/after January 25, 2014.
  • For the January 7, 2014 AIDS due date, applicants should continue to use the ADOBE-FORMS-B packages found in the old Parent Announcements or that remain available in non-parent announcement.
    • Update: This bullet only applies to the Career Development (Ks), Fellowship (Fs), and Training (Ts/Ds) programs that don’t transition to FORMS-C until due dates on/after January 25, 2014. Grant programs that already transitioned to FORMS-C in September (e.g., Rs) must now use FORMS-C for all due dates (including the January 7 AIDS due date).

More Multi-project Activity Codes Moving to Electronic Submission

The second group of activity codes in our transition timeline (G12, P30, P40, P41, P42, P51, P60, R28, S06, U10, U41, U42, U45, U56, UC7) move to electronic application submission for due dates on/after January 25, 2014 (NOT-OD-13-075).

If you are planning to apply to a multi-project program in the near future, you may want to become familiar with the resources available to help you through the electronic submission process: