University of Georgia

Anthropology | | 6 MIN READ

Pivoting during a pandemic: Fieldwork in the time of COVID

By Linda Kosen
four men and a boy looking at map
David Hecht (left) uses collaborative mapping as one method to understand Bhutanese relationships to landscapes. Hecht had to cancel these activities and his other research plans last March and has not been able to return to the United States because of strict travel restrictions. (Photo courtesy of David Hecht)

Getting a text message from the prime minister of Bhutan was the last thing UGA graduate student David Hecht expected during fieldwork.

At the beginning of March, Bhutan had its first case of COVID-19, according to the message—a 76-year-old U.S. tourist who’d arrived in Bhutan via India had been admitted to a hospital and tested positive for the virus. Hecht was in central Bhutan conducting fieldwork that involved gathering people together for community mapping and interviews. The whole country is connected via cellphone and social media apps like WhatsApp, so the information traveled quickly, he said.

“The whole place changed—instantly,” Hecht said. “All of a sudden everyone’s mentality shifted. Fear set in, and people were hyperconscious of each other, and especially foreigners.”

Hecht is an anthropologist who studies the role of religion, communities, and social prohibitions in environmental conservation and the protection of priority bird species. His research effectively came to a halt.

“All of our community meetings were canceled in that moment,” said Hecht.

With little known about COVID-19 at the time, he watched as people stocked up on items like disinfectant and hand sanitizer. He also noticed a shift in people’s perceptions of him as a foreigner. He was self-conscious doing essential activities like going to the market for food, but couldn’t do much other than try to be respectful.

“It was interesting,” he said, “feeling guilty but unable to do anything about it other than wear a mask and keep my distance.”

Tensions have largely subsided since the government restricted travel-related tourism, according to Hecht. Now when people see a foreigner, they know they work and live here, he said.

Hecht’s experience is an example of how many UGA researchers are facing challenges conducting research in locations off campus. This is particularly difficult for social scientists, whose research often requires immersive methodologies like participant observation, interviews and community collaboration.

With COVID-19 disrupting all aspects of life, some faculty and graduate students are using this time to discuss how these unprecedented constraints represent opportunities to develop new methods and approaches, as well as seriously consider the ethical and moral aspects of returning to fieldwork.

two women examining a dog
Nicole Gottdenker (right) studies the relationship between environmental change and zoonotic disease transmission. Her ongoing research in Latin America includes the role of dogs in transmission of Chagas’ disease and leishmaniasis. (Photo courtesy of Nicole Gottdenker)

The ethics of returning

Beyond travel restrictions, there are a host of other issues researchers should consider before returning to fieldwork, according to Hecht.

“We should question not just broader research agendas, but really think critically about the ethical quandaries that come along with doing anything community-related or engaging people who might be marginalized and therefore vulnerable.”

This issue is particularly acute for associate professors Julie Velásquez Runk and Nicole Gottdenker, who are part of a multimember NSF-funded project to study zoonotic disease transmission in Panama.

While the project remains on hold, there are still questions: When should they return? How will team members strike a balance between community safety and research productivity? Runk and Gottdenker are mindful of the history of devastating population losses after European-introduced diseases in the colonial era, as well as the current spike in COVID-19 cases in the United States.

“I don’t want to be there at all if there is the potential of spreading it unintentionally,” said Runk, an interdisciplinary environmental scientist and associate professor in the department of anthropology.

“We really don’t want to invade communities when we shouldn’t be there,” said Gottdenker, associate professor of veterinary pathology. “We really want to be safe.”

Graduate student Vanessa Raditz canceled research plans in Puerto Rico after an influx of COVID-19 cases were linked to spring break tourism.

Raditz, an environmental health researcher who studies LGBTQ+ vulnerability to climate change, said they were particularly concerned about the potential for additional strain on a health care system still dealing with the aftereffects of Hurricane Maria. “It’s immoral and unethical.”

Vanessa Raditz working at desk with laptop and cameras
As a filmmaker, Vanessa Raditz has had to get creative with their use of Zoom during interviews. They often film using several cameras, which capture the conversations from different angles. This gives Raditz more opportunities during the editing process to generate the visual interest that is important for documentary filmmaking. (Photo courtesy of Vanessa Raditz)

COVID-19 constraints spur creative approaches

Embracing the challenge of forgoing fieldwork has led to new innovations and insights. As someone who uses collaborative documentary film in their research, Raditz has had to be particularly creative.

“I have really had to lean into the collaborative aspect,” they said. “I’m doing a lot more with the folks that are on the ground for them to be documenting things, collecting footage and sending it to me, and having conversations about what they are sending to me.”

While many assume effective collaboration requires being in person, Raditz reports the opposite: “It has gotten people a lot more engaged.”

Raditz also adds this experience has made them think more about the relationship between frequent travel and carbon emissions. “The creative constraint that this has created is a good reminder that we do have other ways of doing our research that don’t involve us flying all over the place.”

The push to complete research is particularly important for graduate students, who often find themselves with limited funding and on a specific timeline to graduate, according to Gottdenker.

“What I worry about is graduate students,” she said, “because they might need an extra year of study.

Runk agreed.

“Not having in-person research is making things take much longer.”

Aware of these constraints, and the historical emphasis on doing anthropological fieldwork in foreign locations, she spoke to anthropology students last spring about ways to continue research amid local and international restrictions. These included using public data sources for analysis and using video and other media to create “multimodal” publications.

posters used in Panama that included images of indigenous Wounann and reflected indigenous aesthetics and understandings of health.
Julie Velásquez Runk and collaborators created posters to be used in Panama that included images of indigenous Wounann and reflected indigenous aesthetics and understandings of health. “Avoiding the spread of COVID-19” (left) and “Protecting your community from COVID-19” (right) were based on guidelines from the Panamanian Ministry of Health and World Health Organization. (Courtesy of Julie Velásquez Runk)

Pivoting leads to new insights

Many researchers form direct, sustained and close relationships in the communities where they work and have felt compelled to use their past research experiences to respond to COVID-19. This summer, Runk, who has worked with indigenous communities in Panama for over 20 years, used platforms like WhatsApp to bring together doctoral students and Panamanian collaborators to create COVID-19 health messaging for distribution among indigenous communities.

Given the remoteness of indigenous communities, the team created graphic posters that could be easily distributed and viewed on cell phones. The posters communicated how to protect the community and avoid the spread of COVID-19 in ways that resonated with those specific communities. “We very intentionally worked with vocabulary and images that reinforced indigenous ideas,” Runk said.

Early into the project, Runk and her collaborators realized there was a problem with most stock art and photographic resources. They are often biased in a way that prevents effective communication with indigenous communities. Given the importance of clear messaging during health crises, this insight has generated discussion about the need for future research on developing culturally inclusive resources for stock art and photography.

Hecht, unable to leave Bhutan since March, has watched the COVID-19 pandemic unfold within the country’s unique cultural and political context. The Bhutanese government immediately took steps to support its citizens both at home and abroad. Residents made offerings to their local deities, promoted healing mantras, and distributed laminated cards of Sangay Menlha (Medicine Buddha) within their wider community. Authorities have worked to bridge global health directives with culturally appropriate and reassuring messaging.

For Hecht, one experience in particular stands out.

Last March, shortly after national messages announcing the first case of COVID-19 in the country were sent, many residents received the afternoon off work so they could witness the head of the monastic body, known as the Je Khenpo, initiate the Sangay Menlha over television and social media platforms to assist in the healing of illnesses of both body and mind. Watching from home as hundreds of thousands of residents received the blessings of the Je Khenpo, Hecht felt reassured.

“I felt it—in the community watching it with my friends and colleagues in their homes—this tremendous wave of peace and being well taken care of.”

Related Posts